Category talk:Sexual Activity
From Voyeurweb's Wiki
Would you consider putting Pepfuck in, under P, for a sexual activity?
I propose we delete all of the "pepfuck" references and subcategories. It makes no sense to anyone else but one person, whom admits he made it up himself. In my opinion it has no place in the wiki. It all makes no sense.
Thank you for your candor. Please erase all my contributions and return to me $25.00 for my one year membership of Red Clouds. As I see, I will not have Free Speech on your website.
You're confused, this has nothing to do with RedClouds. Your $25 bought you access to RedClouds, feel free to go there and free speech all you want (within guidelines) VW is free. The question is whether your additions to the wiki add or detract from it. I'm not the one to answer that, but I can use my free speech and add my opinion, as noted above.
I misspoke when I stated "I propose WE delete...." I have no control over deletions and the way I stated it above insinuated that I do have some control. That is not the case, for that I apologize.
I'm not sure I see the harm in him putting his pepfuck terminology under a central page that explains it. Might not need to be linked to a bunch of other pages, but it could catch on just the way Igor's boob references caught on (hugobagos, etc). I'd probably not encourage it to be linked to every reference to suck and fuck and other "uck" words, but no harm in a page or two that he explains and supports I would think. This is a fun endevour...--Cam 20:43, 20 February 2007 (EST)
